<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc=" http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>briancarper.net (λ) (Tag: KMail)</title><link>http://briancarper.net/tag/201/kmail</link><description>Some guy's blog about programming and Linux and cows.</description><item><title>KMail is slow</title><link>http://briancarper.net/blog/kmail-is-slow</link><guid>http://briancarper.net/blog/kmail-is-slow</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:38:48 -0700</pubDate><description>&lt;p&gt;KMail is a pretty good app, except that it's slow as glacier.  If I select a few thousand spam emails in KMail (4.3.2) sitting on my IMAP server, and I try to delete them, KMail laboriously iterates through them deleting them one at a time and updating the GUI after every deletion.  I'd say it averages about 4 or 5 emails deleted per second.  Yes, for a few thousand emails this adds up to 10-15 minutes of waiting.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I got tired of waiting, so I decided to try out Mutt for the first time.  In Mutt apparently you can delete a folder full of emails by pressing &lt;code&gt;D&lt;/code&gt; and then specifying &lt;code&gt;~s .*&lt;/code&gt; as the search pattern.  Mutt deleted 8,000 spam emails for me instantaneously.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is what I get when I ignore the collective wisdom of the Linux group-mind.  I've long heard that Mutt is good but I never bothered trying it, because Thunderbird and KMail and friends were &quot;good enough&quot;.   &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Complacency, my old nemesis.  You have beaten me again.  But I am now going to give Mutt a good try.  Next on the list is zsh.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>

